Unlike Rome, which plays host to wolves, or the suburbs of Berlin, where the intruders are wild boar, my patch in south-west London boasts an urban fox. With his lush orange coat speckled with white and grey, George – or should it be Vivienne – is impressive and, in his demeanour, takes the description of being ‘urban’ to another level. There has been a grassy patch around the Church of St Mary Magdalene, or its predecessors in central Richmond, for almost 800 years. Throughout its history foxes will have come by, but I doubt if any will have behaved quite like George. Everyday for almost a month, he could be seen sunning himself in the graveyard, in full view of the public and totally unconcerned.

Although I say ‘he’, gender assignment was difficult – in this particular respect, foxes are modest and discreet. It was a middle-aged woman who introduced him to me as George – “After Clooney, that is”. While a sligthly older man called her Vivienne because ‘she moves with such feminine grace”. For me, the name George felt right, a hunch that was confirmed soon after he left at the end of May.

When I arrived in Richmond in the early 1990s, fox sightings were viewed as special and worthy of comment. Moreover, when seen, they behaved according to traditional urban fox rules. They appeared in the early morning or late at night, they usually skulked in hedgerows or other dark corners and, if disturbed, would scamper off. In those days they were seen as timid, suspicious and unfriendly. George was very different.

Paths divide up the churchyard and, despite a continuous flow of people, on most days George could be seen on one or other of the cemetery lawns basking on his back, stretched out on his front or sitting on his haunches. When he moved he did not walk, he loped with a swagger. Often passers-by gathered to admire him, to feed him, or even to take his photo for which he sometimes appeared to pose (it’s George in the photo above).

From our very first sighting, my wife and I saw George as a wondrous treasure. To discover whether others felt the same, over one weekend I did a survey. During a series of half-hour slots,  with a pen and clipboard at the ready I sat on one of the walls beside the path waiting to pounce. While some of those I approached walked on smiling and others ignored me or even scowled, most stopped and gave their views.

Of the twenty or so people solicited, around two thirds reported sightings and, it soon became clear that, for most of them, seeing George was a pleasure and a privilege. He was seen as ‘handsome’ and ‘healthy’, ‘cool’, ‘calm’, even ‘chilled’ and, mysteriously ‘well-organised’ and ‘well-dressed’. By his very presence he gave this group of locals feelings of ‘joy’, ‘excitement’, ‘wonder”, ‘thrill’, ‘pride’ and ‘amazement’. Above all, he was viewed as unusual. Many had seen other urban foxes, but in his relaxed, outgoing manner, George was exceptional.

Naturally, some others, a small minority, saw things differently. For them, George was a ‘sickly’, ‘wild’, ‘troublemaker’ who engendered ‘fear’ and ‘suspicion’. He might, after all, ‘attack dogs or children’!

Soon after the survey, George disappeared, and another side of him was revealed.  At the moment the church is being restored in readiness for its forthcoming 800th birthday. One of the artisans working on the project knew the fox well and confirmed that the name George was indeed appropriate  ‘He had a missus living up the hill in the vicarage garden where she looked after their cubs”. That put a new complexion on his demeanour – could it be that George, this paragon of an urban fox,  had spent a month in the churchyard in order to avoid his domestic and parental responsibilities?

And there was more, this time gleaned from the vicar herself. On the same day that George left the churchyard, the vixen and her pups left their garden den. The vicar believed that the whole family, now re-united, had left for the wide open spaces of Richmond Park, a much classier place to bring up a family. With such a move, any pretence George might have of being ‘urban’ could be dropped – until next year that is!

 

18 thoughts on “Mr Fox takes a Break

  1. Dear Joe,
    I loved the story of George the urban fox. We would never see a fox lounging about in Australia, although actually we have had a few who are a threat to native animals. Since there has been work to remove them we now have bush turkeys, often roaming the street! Not quite as graceful as George the fox!
    Love
    Robin

    Like

  2. Dear Robin,
    Nature’s checks and balances are fascinating. When George was around the numbers of pigeons in the churchyard fell as did the number of squirrels. To me, the change in the pigeon population was welcome, that amongst squirrels less so. Whatever the changes, the presence of the fox was the more unusual. Joe

    Like

  3. Yes, the unexpected appearance of a wild, storybook animal – especially one who seems so at home in our company – can bring magic to our twenty first century lives. But it does depend on our imagination and how we respond…our way of being in the world.
    I’d like to quote Ben Okri (from “A Time for New Dreams”):

    “Celebrate, or be dull. Appreciate, or be impoverished. Enhance, or give up the adventure of civilisation. Do not kill the romance of life. Most people want to live in brightened times. Most want to live in an air of enchantment, of creative challenge, of rich possibilities. Every child that becomes an adult wants to live in a world that breathes courage, imagination and beautiful dreams”

    Like

  4. Dear Robert,
    Ben Okri touches on so many important aspects of what it means to be fully alive, to create, to be responsive. It is odd how Mr Fox could be such a powerful catalyst in all this. Joe

    Like

  5. If I were George I wouldn’t linger too long in Richmond Park. Despite the Liberal traditions of the electorate in his part of West London, I fear for his wellbeing beyond next week.

    Theresa’s May’s expected landslide victory next Thursday will allow her to realise her dream of a Great Leap Forward into the 1950s. This will result not just in the reintroduction of Grammar Schools but of fox hunting too. The prospect of a Hard Foxit (most foxes are not in favour of selective education either) then becomes a serious reality.

    It can’t be long before the park once again echoes to sound of hunting horns and the spectacle of red-faced old gents of the North Surrey Hunt in full cry. The Unspeakable in pursuit of The Inedible, as Oscar Wilde I think said. Smart foxes should be applying for their Irish passports without further delay!

    Like

  6. Very enjoyable Joe, your story of George, and I love the Ben Okri quote. Afraid I am not discriminatory about wild things, and find pleasure gazing at their private lives, even pigeons’! Biodiversity to be encouraged in cities, and wildlife corridors and all.

    Like

  7. Dear Al,
    That explains why, and one had to look very closely, George had a banner around his neck with the catchy message ‘No extermination without representation’. Joe

    Like

  8. Lovely posting Joe… really enjoyed it and laughed out loud… just wondered though, could the majority of comments also apply to you (at times)!!

    Like

  9. Lovely photo of the fox, and I was fascinated to hear that he has a townie name – or names.
    However in the country the fox already has a name – and always has had. He has always been personified – the only hunted animal to be so – mirroring the foxhunters’ shamanic identification with their prey.

    He was Tod to our Celtic ancestors, Reynard in the Middle Ages, and since the 18th century he has been Charlie, after Charles James Fox.

    I have a whole illustrated talk on this very subject! It is on DVD; you can email me for a copy on m@harpur.org

    Like

  10. Dear Joe
    We evolved sharing the earth with living things, and when I go deeper inside myself I find that the thought of encountering Mr Fox in the grass beside the pathway in the old churchyard is accompanied by a feeling of coming home.
    I think you’ve touched something special in our psyches.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s